<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 砖家的预计——推断统计之痛</title>
	<atom:link href="http://zengqi.net/index.php/2010/03/03/forecasts-by-experts-the-pains-of-inferential-statistics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://zengqi.net/index.php/2010/03/03/forecasts-by-experts-the-pains-of-inferential-statistics/</link>
	<description>苦中带甜，这才是人生</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 02:48:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Qi</title>
		<link>http://zengqi.net/index.php/2010/03/03/forecasts-by-experts-the-pains-of-inferential-statistics/comment-page-1/#comment-328</link>
		<dc:creator>Qi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Mar 2010 03:34:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zengqi.net/?p=558#comment-328</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-324&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Molly &lt;/a&gt; 
呵呵，现在的economics也几乎完全&quot;econometricalized&quot;了</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-324" rel="nofollow">@Molly </a><br />
呵呵，现在的economics也几乎完全&#8221;econometricalized&#8221;了</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Molly</title>
		<link>http://zengqi.net/index.php/2010/03/03/forecasts-by-experts-the-pains-of-inferential-statistics/comment-page-1/#comment-324</link>
		<dc:creator>Molly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 05:50:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zengqi.net/?p=558#comment-324</guid>
		<description>“与其多跑几次回归分析匆匆得出结论，还不如踏踏实实研究数据变动背后的理论来得实际；即便前者往往更酷更炫。人们都喜欢用模型来简化世界，但是世界从来就没有简单过，简化来简化去最后的结果只是简化了自己结论的可信度。”
这种态度适合去读economics。</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“与其多跑几次回归分析匆匆得出结论，还不如踏踏实实研究数据变动背后的理论来得实际；即便前者往往更酷更炫。人们都喜欢用模型来简化世界，但是世界从来就没有简单过，简化来简化去最后的结果只是简化了自己结论的可信度。”<br />
这种态度适合去读economics。</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Qi</title>
		<link>http://zengqi.net/index.php/2010/03/03/forecasts-by-experts-the-pains-of-inferential-statistics/comment-page-1/#comment-299</link>
		<dc:creator>Qi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 01:36:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zengqi.net/?p=558#comment-299</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-297&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@栾嘉悦 &lt;/a&gt; 
呵呵，我只是看了链接里面的那个视频以后想抨击一下…</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-297" rel="nofollow">@栾嘉悦 </a><br />
呵呵，我只是看了链接里面的那个视频以后想抨击一下…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 栾嘉悦</title>
		<link>http://zengqi.net/index.php/2010/03/03/forecasts-by-experts-the-pains-of-inferential-statistics/comment-page-1/#comment-297</link>
		<dc:creator>栾嘉悦</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 05:09:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zengqi.net/?p=558#comment-297</guid>
		<description>写的太好都没人敢留言啦
虽然是个外行,不太适合评论,可我觉得分析的很好耶
应该多让那些看得懂的人看到</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>写的太好都没人敢留言啦<br />
虽然是个外行,不太适合评论,可我觉得分析的很好耶<br />
应该多让那些看得懂的人看到</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

